LOI · Energy Services

Earnout Structures Counsel for Energy Services Acquisitions

When the deal is energy services and the question is Earnout Structures, the structure decisions in the first 30 days outlast the next five years. This is where Jason Powell works.

EV range $10M to $140M EV EBITDA $2.5M to $24M Audience Buy & Sell-side
The deal context

An independent sponsor closing energy services transactions in the $10M to $140M EV range has a defined set of moves at the Earnout Structures stage. Most of them are not in a generic M&A textbook.

The typical energy services platform sits at $10M to $140M EV with EBITDA in the $2.5M to $24M range. The thesis runs on regional oilfield service or renewable services consolidation. Underwrite the trough, not the peak. Capital partners will.

The moves

How Earnout Structures actually gets structured.

  1. Tie the earnout to gross profit or contribution margin, not revenue, to avoid sandbagging.

  2. Cap the earnout window at 24 months. Anything longer is a litigation risk.

  3. Build acceleration on a change of control or buyer-driven operational change.

  4. Name an arbitrator and the accounting standard in the agreement.

  5. In energy services, layer in earnout indexed to gross margin instead of revenue as part of the Earnout Structures workstream.

The common mistake

Drafting the earnout in three paragraphs. Earnouts are the second-most-litigated provision in M&A.

Jason's take
"If the earnout could be measured by a teenager with a spreadsheet, you wrote it well."
Jason Powell · Earnout Structures
Capital after close

The deal is one thing. The capital that opens up after close is another.

The capital that opens up post-close, from refinancing to growth equity to strategic exit, runs through a small set of Wall Street relationships. That network is built in.

MONTH 18
Senior refi
MONTH 24
Dividend recap
MONTH 36
Growth equity
YEAR 4–5
Strategic exit
TALK TO JASON

An LOI on the desk, a energy services target, and a Earnout Structures question worth a real conversation.

Twenty minutes of practitioner-grade input from a securities attorney whose first move is to read the deal, not the engagement letter.