Post-close · Vertical SaaS

Post-Close Governance Counsel for Vertical SaaS Acquisitions

Designing Post-Close Governance on vertical SaaS deals, with the structure protection and capital connectivity an independent sponsor actually needs.

EV range $10M to $200M EV EBITDA $2M to $30M (or run-rate ARR) Audience Independent Sponsor
The deal context

Every vertical SaaS acquisition has its own gravity. Post-Close Governance is the workstream where independent sponsor counsel earns the seat.

The typical vertical SaaS platform sits at $10M to $200M EV with EBITDA in the $2M to $30M (or run-rate ARR) range. The thesis runs on platform plus adjacent module acquisitions inside a single end-market. The ARR number on the CIM is rarely the ARR number on the closing balance sheet. Reconcile early.

The moves

How Post-Close Governance actually gets structured.

  1. Build a board with sponsor majority, one LP-elected seat, and one independent.

  2. Define LP protective provisions narrowly, focused on dilution, exit, and related-party transactions.

  3. Set information rights at monthly financial and quarterly board-level updates.

  4. Plan the annual budget approval cadence so the sponsor can run the business.

  5. In vertical SaaS, layer in ARR bridge built before LOI signing as part of the Post-Close Governance workstream.

The common mistake

Negotiating governance like a fund LPA. independent sponsor governance has to be lighter and faster.

Jason's take
"Governance design decides whether the operator runs the company or files reports."
Jason Powell · Post-Close Governance
Capital after close

The deal is one thing. The capital that opens up after close is another.

Most independent sponsors solve the closing capital and then run into the post-close capital problem alone. The capital markets relationships that matter at month 18 are part of this practice.

MONTH 18
Senior refi
MONTH 24
Dividend recap
MONTH 36
Growth equity
YEAR 4–5
Strategic exit
TALK TO JASON

An LOI on the desk, a vertical SaaS target, and a Post-Close Governance question worth a real conversation.

Twenty minutes of practitioner-grade input from a securities attorney whose first move is to read the deal, not the engagement letter.